2019 06 19 38 900w 

2019 06 19 39 900w

Crowds at October 17th, 2018 Master Plan Open House Visioning Session & defacto Community Survey

 

In brief, at this 6/19/2019 meetup of the Northfield Township Planning Commission: Five of the seven planning commissioners were present.  Township Board Representative Janet Chick and Planning Commission Chairman Larry Roman were absent.  Craig Warburton and County Commissioner Susan Shink comprised the entire audience.  A late correspondence from a Dominoes Farms development entity was entered into the record.  Dominoes expressed a vaguely described interest in having the new Master Plan accomodate their plans to develop various landholdings in the Southeast corner of Northfield Township, or something to that effect.  Maybe we'll get that two hundred foot statue of Jesus rejected by Ann Arbor, eh?

The public hearing was opened and closed but any substantive discussion of the draft Master Plan was tabled until all seven Commissioners could be present.  This date was tentatively set as July 17th, the second meeting date in July.  .

During the limited discussion, Commissioner Iaquinto berated Planner Lippens for heeding the public comments and modifying the draft Master Plan to reflect the public's wishes.  Iaquinto focused his ire on the issues focused on by Township Trustee Zelenock in the letter embedded in this meeting's packet.  Iaquinto demanded that Lippens remove any draft plan language written as a response to Zelenock's letter.  He posed this demand as a complaint about the process, in a deep dive into irony saying that no single trustee or commissioner had a right to dictate what could or could not be inserted into the plan.   

Lippens defended his product vigorously.  [Adverbs are for idiots and the tweets of idiots, but I'm using that adverb as a placeholder anyway.  More details will follow.]  In short, Lippens said that the draft plan reflected his best professional estimate of what the sum total of surveys, visioning, citizen feedback, Master Plans past, and accomodation to a modeled, predicted, probable future, required.

   

Master Plans, most recent drafts first:

 

Meeting documents:

The October 17th Master Plan Open House

Report by David Gordon, November 2, 2018

Big Idea Postits unskewed DJG 800w488h

 Big Idea Poster iPhone photo by David Gordon

 

At the Oct. 17th “Open House” hosted by the Planning Commission as part of its $25,000 Master Plan review process, the overwhelming message was the same as it has been since 1996:

 Preservation is our #1 priority and a little bit of development is wanted;

but only if it doesn’t harm our beautiful lake and farmland areas.

 Preservation of farmland, open space and natural areas topped the list in the “voting” done by the 44 residents who put Post-It “dots” next to 49 different categories offered on seven poster boards.

The “dots” confirmed that residents also want downtown spruced up and would like a little bit of residential development in specific areas with existing infrastructure.

There were good insights offered on the “Big Ideas” poster board and stuck to the other six poster boards.   A quick glance at these photos tells the story. (LINK TO PHOTOS HERE)

Nearly every poster board shows that preservation and parks win out over development. Even on the poster board entitled “Residential Area”, parks and preservation got the majority of votes.

At the end of the 90-minute session, township planner Paul Lippens said the dots were “only indicators” and he would “interpret” them in his final report to the Planning Commission within the next month.

Back in 1996, the Planning Commission hired a University of Michigan professor to conduct a scientific survey the whole community and then used the results to rewrite the Master Plan.  

That 1996 survey came up with the same results. Land preservation was the #1 Priority.  (see northfieldneighbors.today for results from that survey)

At the first Board of Trustees meeting after the Open House, several members criticized the meeting as chaotic and unprofessional and the entire Board agreed that the current Master Plan “is pretty solid as written”.

“The Master Plan only needs a few tweaks,” said Supervisor Marlene Chockley. However, an opportunity was missed at the Open House because it was unclear what “tweaks” are being considered, so nobody got to vote on them.  

While the State of Michigan requires that a township review its Master Plan every five years, many communities do a quick review and simply re-adopt the plan; a process that meets state mandates.

Master Plan “Open House” vote tally of the poster boards.

By David Gordon   11/2/18

There were a total of 720 “dots” placed on the seven poster boards.  ***

SUMMARY:

The voting clearly shows that residents approve of the vision currently outlined in the Master Plan.

Based on the voting, residents prefer preservation/parks over growth/development by a substantial margin. This is no surprise.

Fixing up downtown is important and some residential growth is wanted. Development at the Six Mile and North Territorial highway interchanges is a low priority.

 

GOALS:

245 total votes   = 34%

There were 8 choices and these three got the most support:

  • “Maintain the rural character” and “preserve open space”: 125 votes
  • “Guide residential development…to enhance (the township)…”: 70 votes
  • “Preserve and strengthen…the character of downtown…”: 23 votes

 

AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION AREAS:

152 votes = 21%

There were 6 choices for “Preferred Land Use”:

The leading two were:

  • “Farming…scenic road corridors…orchards…silos…scenic views”: 108 votes
  • “Low-density clustered with 50% preserved & 5-acre homes”: 43 vote

 

RESIDENTIAL AREAS:

114 votes = 16%

There were 12 choices on this board asking for land use preferences.

Even in this category, preservation topped residential growth.

  • Farming and “parks, open space and conservation”:       61 votes
  • Residential development: 50 votes (breakdown of this vote below)
    • Single family homes: 36 votes
    • “Innovative”….”including senior housing”: 10 votes
    • Duplex and apartments: 4 votes

 

6 MILE INTERCHANGE:

59 votes = 8%

There were 6 categories available on this board with the voting about

evenly split:

  • Residential - Single family clustered; subdivisions; 2-family”:       28 votes
  • “Parks, open space and conservation areas”: 23 votes
  • Restaurants: 8 votes

 

N. TERRITORIAL INTERCHANGE & WHITMORE LAKE ROAD:

34 votes = 5%

Five categories were available for dots on this board: here’s the breakdown:

  • “Office research and retail…”: 24 votes
  • “…limited industrial…”: 8 votes
  • Other – 9 votes.
  • “…high density residential…”: 1 vote

VISUAL PREFERENCE:  

115 votes = 16%

In brief, residents seemed to prefer “park-like” and “natural” landscapes.

*** Only the top vote-getting categories on each poster board were counted so they won’t add up to the total number of votes for each board.

 

Below are two sets of photographs of the Open House posters. One set was taken by David Gordon about 20 minutes before the open house closed. These are clearly captioned as his photographs.  The other photographs were taken by Jim Nelson after the session had closed and there was room to move around.  

This first poster has been straightened in photoshop.  I'll make time to straighten and de-skew the rest of the poster photographs.  Check back a few days from now, 10/30.

 

Big Idea Postits unskewed DJG 900w.jpg

 Big Idea Poster: iPhone photo by David GordonPostProc by JGN

Here is our Planner's Big Idea Poster, photographed in pieces after the very informal close of the open house. It is stitched together from twenty close-ups. Beneath this is a link to an immense, 50MB+, png file of the same composite image. It is about 8500 pixels wide by 9500 pixels high. The long green postit letter visible in this post open house photo that's missing from the earlier photo taken by Gordon - is in one of the detail photos below. Scroll down to find it.

Big Idea Panorama automatic 1 1000w1166h

 HUGE FILE HUGE  click here for the high quality but immense version of the Big Idea bulletin board.   HUGE FILE HUGE

Below these 20 photos you will find photos and closeups of the other public comment posters.

 

Goals 2 900w

 Goals photo 2, 10/17/2018 8:52PM, PostProcessing by JGN

 

Goals 3 900w

 Goals photo 3, iPhone photo by David Gordon

 

Preferred-Future-Land-Use-Agricultural-Preservation-Areas-1-900w

Preferred Future Land Use Agricultural Preservation Areas photo 1

 

Preferred-Future-Land-Use-Agricultural-Preservation-Areas-2-900w.jpg

Preferred Future Land Use Agricultural Preservation Areas photo 2

 

Preferred-Future-Land-Use-MDR-and-Highway-Commercial-1-900w.jpg

Preferred Future Land Use Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Highway Commercial photo 1

 

Preferred-Future-Land-Use-MDR-and-Highway-Commercial-2-900w.jpg

Preferred Future Land Use Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Highway Commercial photo 2

 

Goals 3 900w

 Preferred Future Land Use Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Highway Commercial photo 3, iPhone photo by David Gordon, PostProc by JGN

 

Preferred-Future-Land-Use-N-Territorial-Interchange-900w.jpg

Preferred Future Land Use: N Territorial Interchange, photo 1

 

Goals 3 900w

 Preferred Future Land Use: N Territorial Interchange, photo 2, iPhone photo by David Gordon

 

Preferred-Future-Land-Use-Residential-Areas-1-900w.jpg

Preferred Future Land Use Residential Areas photo 1

 

Preferred-Future-Land-Use-Residential-Areas-2-900w.jpg

Preferred Future Land Use Residential Areas photo 2

 

Preferred-Future-Land-Use-Residential-Areas-DJG-900w.jpg

 Preferred Future Land Use Residential Areas photo 3, iPhone photo by David Gordon

 

Visual-Preference-green-infrastructure-900w.jpg

Visual Preference green infrastructure

 

Visual Preference green infrastructure

 Visual Preference green infrastructure, iPhone photo by David Gordon

 

Visual-Preference-landscaping-900w.jpg

Visual Preference landscaping

 

Visual Preference landscaping

 Visual Preference landscaping, iPhone photo by David Gordon

p> 

Below are my twenty phone photos of the postits plastered on the Big Idea poster.  The quality varies.  When I figure out a way to zone and split the above, you will be able to zoom in on individual pages of postits.  Until that time, this is it.

 BigIdea 302 landscape 900w

 BigIdea photo 302

 

 BigIdea 305 landscape 900w

 BigIdea photo 305

 

 BigIdea 307 landscape 900w

 BigIdea photo 307

 

 BigIdea 309 landscape 900w

 BigIdea photo 309

 

 BigIdea 314 landscape 900w

 BigIdea photo 314

 

 BigIdea 318 landscape 900w

 BigIdea photo 318

 

 BigIdea 322 landscape 900w

 BigIdea photo 322

 

 BigIdea 325 landscape 900w

 BigIdea photo 325

 

 BigIdea 327 landscape 900w

 BigIdea photo 327

 

 BigIdea 329 landscape 900w

 BigIdea photo 329

 

 BigIdea 331 landscape 900w

 BigIdea photo 331

 

 BigIdea 334 landscape 900w

 BigIdea photo 334

 

 BigIdea 336 landscape 900w

 BigIdea photo 336

 

 BigIdea 340 landscape 900w

 BigIdea photo 340

 

 BigIdea 342 landscape 900w

 BigIdea photo 342

 

 BigIdea 345 landscape 900w

 BigIdea photo 345

 

 BigIdea 348 landscape 900w

 BigIdea photo 348

 

 BigIdea 350 landscape 900w

 BigIdea photo 350

 

 BigIdea 354 landscape 900w

 BigIdea photo 354

 

 BigIdea 358 landscape 900w

 BigIdea photo 358

 

 Big Idea Bulletin Board DJG 900w.jpg

 Goals Closeup of green postits, iPhone photo by David Gordon

 

 

2010 survey ten best things 688w532h

 Chart: page 9    Data: page 53-54 of 101 page report

Watch video of Beckett & Raeder Planner Leah DuMouchel explaining the significance of the 1996 and 2010 Community Surveys to the Northfield Township Planning Commission.

Read the Powerpoint document DuMouchel used to explain the 1996 and 2010 Northfield Township Community Surveys.

 

2010 survey Question 24 priorities bar chart 688w561h

 Chart: page 11    Data: page 57-58 of 101 page report

 

2010 survey ten worst things 688w 505h

 Chart: page 10    Data: page 55-56 of 101 page report

 

 

2010 Northfield Township Survey

   
 

23. What are the 3 worst features of Northfield Township?

%

Responses

       

1

Combined local tax burden

35.50

129

2

Lack of commercial development

31.10

113

3

Inadequate road maintenance

29.50

107

4

High local taxes (township)

27.00

98

5

Lack of downtown identity/feel

22.90

83

6

Lack of nearby shopping options

21.80

79

7

Lack of safe non-motorized transport (bike)

16.80

61

8

High local taxes (school)

16.30

59

9

No municipal water supply

15.40

56

10

Other

14.00

51

11

lack of park and recreation options

8.00

29

12

Lack of cultural opportunities

7.70

28

13

Traffic congeston

7.70

28

14

Lack of public transportation

6.90

25

15

Whitmore lake schools

5.80

21

16

High cost of living

5.50

20

17

Lack of proximity to my employment

3.30

12

18

Too much commercial development

1.90

7

19

Lack of affordable homes

1.90

7

20

Limited housing options

1.90

7

21

Public safety

1.90

7

22

Proximity fo Dexter

1.70

6

23

Access to top tier schools

1.40

5

24

Close to highways

1.40

5

25

Proximity to A2

0.80

3

26

Rural character

0.60

2

 

Ann arbor schools

0.30

1

 

Dexter schools

0.00

0

 

South Lyon schools

0.00

0